John Gibson Responds to Allegations of Racism
John Gibson has responded angrily to critics such as myself who have denounced his well-meaning remarks on preserving the country through eugenics. He has made two separate defenses of his piece, hurling masses of flaming rhetoric at those who took the opportunity to call him the "r" word, claiming they pieced together parts of his speech out of context to portray him in a negative light.In the spirit of fairness, I'll post his rebuttals here for my extensive world-wide audience.
Point One - I'm not a racist, I'm a nationalist. There's a difference.
"My concern was simply that I didn't want America to become Europe, where the birth rate is so low the continent is fast being populated by immigrants, mainly from Muslim countries, whose birth rate is very high," adding, "I said ... it was also a good idea if people other than Hispanics also got busy and have more babies. Those people would include both blacks and whites. I suppose Asians, too."Well that's refreshing. He isn't prejudiced against all other races besides his own, which makes his discrimination a-ok. He doesn't want to get rid of all of the other races, he just wants to be able to dictate the levels of each race that are living within our borders. How magnanimous of him to invite the little races to join with him in the babymaking offensive. Why, even the Asians can join, I suppose, as long as they're American and not Hispanic. (Apparently it hasn't occurred to Mr. Gibson yet that many, many Hispanic people are in fact *gasp* American! Shh! Don't tell him. We're going to wait to see how long it takes him to figure it out.)
Point Two - I'm being misquoted.
I have to admit, that's not what he said. John Gibson actually suggested that we should make more babies because the Hispanic race is being forced to be the Atlas to our teetering babysphere because we are selfishly refraining from procreating. Haven't we all heard this argument before? We need Hispanic immigrants because they come to America and make the babies that Americans refuse to make."I did say Hispanics have a higher birth rate than others in this country, but what I also said was that the others shouldn't make Hispanics carry the whole load of population replenishment. It's hard work having kids.
A Fox-hating and Gibson-hating blog reported [that] Gibson said brown people are bad, whites should have babies to keep browns down. This is not true. Not what I said, not what I meant, not what I think, yet this lie has even appeared in Time magazine."
Final Point: Europe is on the brink of collapse due to reproductive selfishness, and we're next!
"Why? Because we see what is happening in Europe. Russia is a good example. When people stop having babies because they are inconvenient, populations cease being self-sustaining, end up filling population gaps with immigrants who then make demands on the culture the homies might not like, such as demands for Sharia law
in some parts of Europe."
Maybe a better heading for this argument would be "I'm not a racist, I'm an idiot." John Gibson seems bound and determined to convince us that he really thinks that every time an American child is born *poof* a Hispanic immigrant child disappears into the ether. What other conclusions are we left with when he presents this "solution" to his purported "problem"? In John Gibson's world these immigrants and their babies are sucked into the vortex created by the baby vaccuum left behind by our disinterest in parenting.
My Conclusion - Is John Gibson a racist, or is he just appallingly stupid?
Yes.


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home